Robertson
(HC) Hicks v. Robertson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRANKIE LON HICKS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01276-SKO-HC
Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND
TO NAME A PROPER RESPONDENT
v.
JIM ROBERTSON, Warden, Respondent.
16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In the petition filed on August 23, 2021, Petitioner failed to name a respondent. Petitioner was granted leave to amend to name a proper respondent, and on September 24, 2021, Petitioner moved to amend the petition to name Jim Robertson, the warden of his institution, as Respondent in this matter. The state officer having custody of Petitioner is the proper respondent. Rule 2 (a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez, 81 F.3d 891, 894 (9th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion to amend the petition to name Jim Robertson, Warden, as Respondent is GRANTED.