Shaffer
(PC) Brown v. Shaffer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH A. BROWN, Case No. 1:18-cv-00470-AWI-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
v. DISMISS1 AND DENY OTHER MOTIONS
AS MOOT
JENNIFER SHAFFER; ET. AL., (Doc. Nos. 26, 30, 31 ) Defendants.
FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
16 Pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed on behalf of Defendants Shaffer, Minor, and O’Hara. (Doc. No. 26). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition. (Doc. No. 27). Defendants filed a Reply. (Doc. No. 28). Plaintiff filed a Sur-Reply. (Doc. No. 29). This matter is ripe for review. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends the
21 1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302 (E.D. Cal. 2019). 2 Parties do not have a right to file a sur-reply. Local Rule 230(l). Generally, courts disfavor sur-replies absent articulation of good cause…