Covello

(HC) Roessler v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20212:19-cv-02422California388 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LEE ROESSLER, No. 2:19-cv-02422-KJM-JDP (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER PATRICK COVELLO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Respondent moved to dismiss the petition. ECF No. 13. On August 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, ECF No 41, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Respondent has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 42 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.