Swasey
Swasey v. Seterus, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK SWASEY and TRISHELE No. 2:16-cv-01633-TLN-EFB
SWASEY,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.
SETERUS, INC.; FEDERAL NATIONAL
MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; and DOES 1 to 50, 16 Defendants.
18 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants’ Seterus, Inc. (“Seterus”) and Federal National Mortgage Association’s (“Fannie Mae”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (ECF No. 43.) Plaintiffs Mark Swasey and Trishele Swasey (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) oppose Defendants’ motion. (ECF No. 47.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 48.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion. (ECF No. 43.) /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 Plaintiffs were homeowners who seek damages and injunctive relief based on Defendants’ alleged wrongful foreclosure of their home at 547 Penstock Drive, Grass Valley, California 95945 (the “Property”). (See ECF No.…