Swasey

Swasey v. Seterus, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20212:16-cv-01633California4,498 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK SWASEY and TRISHELE No. 2:16-cv-01633-TLN-EFB

SWASEY,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

SETERUS, INC.; FEDERAL NATIONAL

MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; and DOES 1 to 50, 16 Defendants.

18 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants’ Seterus, Inc. (“Seterus”) and Federal National Mortgage Association’s (“Fannie Mae”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (ECF No. 43.) Plaintiffs Mark Swasey and Trishele Swasey (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) oppose Defendants’ motion. (ECF No. 47.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 48.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion. (ECF No. 43.) /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 Plaintiffs were homeowners who seek damages and injunctive relief based on Defendants’ alleged wrongful foreclosure of their home at 547 Penstock Drive, Grass Valley, California 95945 (the “Property”). (See ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.