Lizzaraga
(PC) Henderson v. Lizzaraga
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, SR., No. 2:18-CV-2181-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOE LIZZARAGA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are: (1) plaintiff’s motion for a settlement conference (ECF No. 51); (2) plaintiff’s motion for appointed counsel (ECF No. 54); (3) plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s motion for summary judgement (ECF No. 61); and (4) plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 65). / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / DISCUSSION 1. Motion to For Settlement Conference Plaintiff moves for the Court to order a settlement conference between the parties. See ECF No. 51. In any action, the Court may utilize its discretion and order the attorneys and any unrepresented parties to appear for a settlement conference. See…