Guillen

Guillen v. Colombana

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20212:19-cv-00655California260 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Erica Guillen, No. 2:19-cv-00655-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. Ricardo Colombana and Mirella Colombana, 1S Defendants. 16 The court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss with leave to amend on October 10, 2019. ECF No. 21. Plaintiff was permitted 21 days to amend her complaint. No amended complaint has been filed. On April 12, 2021, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why this 20 action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution, and plaintiff has not responded. The court has considered (1) “the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation,” (2) “the court’s need to manage its docket,” (3) “the risk of prejudice to the defendants,” (4) “the 23 public policy favoring disposition of cases on their merits,” and (5) “the availability of less drastic 24 sanctions.” Dahl vy. City of Huntington Beach, 84 F.3d 363, 366 (9th Cir. 1996). With the 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.