Schubert

(PC) Howell v. Schubert

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20212:19-cv-00266California417 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM J. HOWELL, No. 2: 19-cv-0266 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANN MARIE SCHUBERT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 16, 2021, the magistrate judge filed amended findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 39. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and, except as noted below, finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. The court writes separately to note it declines to adopt footnote 3 of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.