Reddy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, Jr., Case No. 2:17-cv-01434-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO COMPEL AND TO MODIFY

v. THE AUGUST 3, 2020 SCHEDULING

ORDER AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REDDY, et al., MOTION TO COMPEL Defendants. ECF Nos. 58 & 71 16 17 Plaintiff brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants Baughman, Peterson, and Percy violated his Eighth Amendment rights by forcibly administering psychiatric medication. Defendants have filed a motion to compel, arguing that plaintiff failed to respond adequately to several of their interrogatories and requests for production. They also move to modify the scheduling order to extend the deadlines for completion of discovery and for filing dispositive motions. Plaintiff has filed his own motion to compel, alleging that defendants failed to answer his second set of interrogatories and requests for production. For the…