Guibord

(PC) Turner v. Guibord

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20212:19-cv-00416California406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY DEWAYNE LEE TURNER, No. 2:19-cv-00416-TLN-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO CITY FIRE DEPT., et. al., 15 Defendants.

17 On August 9, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 41), which the 18 magistrate judge subsequently denied (ECF No. 42). On August 25, 2021, Plaintiff filed a 19 “Motion for Judicial Intervention and Motion for Reconsideration” of the magistrate judge’s 20 decision. (ECF No. 44.) This Court, upon review, found that reconsideration was not warranted 21 and affirmed the magistrate judge’s findings. (ECF No. 45.) 22 On September 20, 2021, Plaintiff filed a “Request for Judicial Intervention,” (ECF No. 23 46), and on September 22, 2021, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Request for Reconsideration” 24 (ECF No. 47). Through his motions, Plaintiff renews his request for counsel and argues that he 25 met the standard in his prior request of showing that the magistrate judge’s order was “clearly 26 erroneous.” (ECF No. 47 at 2.) 27 / / / …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.