Lopez

Lopez v. Cequel Communications, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20212:20-cv-02242California1,396 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMIE LOPEZ, individually and on behalf No. 2:20-cv-02242-TLN-JDP of all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

CEQUEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

d/b/a SUDDENLINK COMMUNICATIONS; and DOES 1–25, inclusive, Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Jamie Lopez’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 7.) Defendant Cequel Communications, LLC, d/b/a Suddenlink Communications (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 11.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Defendant is an internet service provider for consumers, such as Plaintiff, in Placer, El Dorado, and Nevada Counties in California. (ECF No. 1-1 at 8.) Plaintiff alleges that although Defendant “promises reliable broadband internet services with download speeds up to 100 to 940 megabits per…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.