Beregovskaya

(PC) Anderson v. Beregovskaya

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20211:21-cv-01451California1,367 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES HENRY ANDERSON, ) Case No. 1:21-cv-01451-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION v. ) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST THE

DR. OLGA BEREGOVSKAYA, ) ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES )

Defendant. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff James Henry Anderson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed September 29, 2021. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.