Kernan

(PC) Florence v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20211:19-cv-00331California8,199 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID FLORENCE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00331-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

v. ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

KERNAN, et al., (ECF No. 46) Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

12 Plaintiff David Florence (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed August 30, 2021, (ECF No. 46), is currently before the Court for screening. I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.