(PS)(UD)Barragan

(PS)(UD)Barragan v. Croney

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20211:21-cv-01427California1,065 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE BARRAGAN, No. 1:21-cv-01427-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUA PONTE REMANDING CASE

TO STANISLAUS COUNTY SUPERIOR

DAVE CRONEY, COURT AND DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT

Defendant. (Doc. Nos. 1, 2)

17 This is an unlawful detainer action brought under California state law by plaintiff Michelle Barragan against defendant Dave Croney. On September 27, 2021, defendant removed this case to this federal court from the Stanislaus County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 1.) According to defendant, removal is proper because the landlord provided a defective notice to quit. (Id.) Defendant asserts that this action could originally have been filed in federal court, but he does not identify any federal questions that his assertion in this regard is based on. (Id. at 2.) Defendant merely states that federal questions exists because defendant’s answer depends on the determination of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.