(SS) Voorhees v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20212:20-cv-00916California2,386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERIANNE R. VOORHEES, Case No. 2:20-cv-00916-JDP (SS) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING CLAIMANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. ECF No. 19 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY Defendant. JUDGMENT 16 ECF No. 25 17 Jerianne R. Voorhees (“claimant”) challenges the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying claimant’s application for supplemental security income benefits for lack of disability. She argues that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) committed reversible error in failing to evaluate her depression and anxiety and in failing to develop an adequate record on her mental health limitations. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 19, 25. The matter is ripe for review, and the court now grants claimant’s motion for summary judgment and denies the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment.1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.