Navarro

(PC) Dixon v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20212:19-cv-01966California1,019 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 DELMAR JEWELL DIXON, Jr., No. 2:19-cv-1966 KJM JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOE LIZARRAGA, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, an incarcerated person proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff has filed four complaints. Plaintiff amended the first complaint as of right. See First Am. Compl., ECF No. 10. Plaintiff amended his complaint twice more when the original magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim but granted leave to amend to cure deficiencies. See Order (April 28, 2020), ECF No. 15; Second Am. Compl., ECF No. 18; Order (August 27, 2020), ECF No. 20; Third Am. Compl., ECF No. 22. On November 18, 2020, the current magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (F&Rs) related to plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.