Langdon
Jose Murguia v. Langdon
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE MURGUIA, for himself and for the No. 1:19-cv-00942-DAD-BAM Estates of Mason and Maddox Murguia, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS 14 HEATHER LANGDON, et al., (Doc. Nos. 38, 40, 41, 43) 15 Defendants.
17 Before the court are four motions to dismiss filed by defendants City of Visalia and Officer Hernandez (Doc. No. 38), defendant First Assembly of God of Visalia (“First Assembly”) (Doc. No. 40), defendants Cerda, Lewis, Torres, and County of Tulare (collectively “county defendants”) (Doc. No. 41), and defendants Davis, Garcia, Valencia, and City of Tulare (collectively “city defendants”) (Doc. No. 43). Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the motions were taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. Nos. 39, 42, 44.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant the motions to dismiss. BACKGROUND …