Langdon

Jose Murguia v. Langdon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20211:19-cv-00942California10,116 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE MURGUIA, for himself and for the No. 1:19-cv-00942-DAD-BAM Estates of Mason and Maddox Murguia, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS 14 HEATHER LANGDON, et al., (Doc. Nos. 38, 40, 41, 43) 15 Defendants.

17 Before the court are four motions to dismiss filed by defendants City of Visalia and Officer Hernandez (Doc. No. 38), defendant First Assembly of God of Visalia (“First Assembly”) (Doc. No. 40), defendants Cerda, Lewis, Torres, and County of Tulare (collectively “county defendants”) (Doc. No. 41), and defendants Davis, Garcia, Valencia, and City of Tulare (collectively “city defendants”) (Doc. No. 43). Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the motions were taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. Nos. 39, 42, 44.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant the motions to dismiss. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.