Paralles

(HC) Gosztyla v. Paralles

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20212:21-cv-01815California433 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHANTELL GOSZTYLA, 1:21-cv-01462-HBK (HC)

Petitioner,

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE

v. SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

M. PARALLES,

Respondent. 16 Petitioner is proceeding pro se on her petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). Petitioner is a prisoner incarcerated in Madera County, which is located within the jurisdiction and venue of this court’s Fresno Division. Petitioner challenges her state sentence and conviction entered by the Superior Court of Sacramento County, which is located within the jurisdiction and venue of the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), jurisdiction is proper in the judicial district where the petitioner was convicted or where the petitioner is incarcerated. Therefore, both the Fresno Division and the Sacramento Division of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.