(PC)Ramirez

(PC)Ramirez v. Khale

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20211:21-cv-01237California869 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, 1:21-cv-01237-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE

vs. BE DISMISSED AS BARRED BY HECK

V. HUMPHREY, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) AND

KHALE, EDWARDS v. BALISOK, 520 U.S. 641 (1997). Defendant. (ECF No. 1.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

20 I. BACKGROUND Israel Maldonado Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) is a detainee at Atascadero State Hospital in Atascadero, California, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 16, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On September 27, 2021, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to respond and show cause why the Complaint should not be dismissed as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and Edwards v. Balisok,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.