Warden
(PC) Rogers v. Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILIP JAMES ROGERS, No. 1:18-cv-00846-NONE-JLT Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF
FROM JUDGMENT
WARDEN, et al., (Doc. No. 54) Defendants. 16 On February 8, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained a notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (Doc. No. 42.) Therefore, objections were due February 25, 2021. (Id.); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d) (extending deadline by three extra days for parties who receive service by mail). After neither party filed objections, on March 8, 2021, the court entered an order adopting in full the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations and granting then-defendant Bettencourt’s motion for summary judgment due to plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. No. 47.) However, plaintiff had filed…