De Picciotto v. Seneca Healthcare District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9 FRED DE PICCIOTTO, No. 2:19-CV-01297-TLN-DMC 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER SENECA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, and LINDA WAGNER, Defendants. 15 After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the Court 16 hereby amends the Pretrial Scheduling Order.
I. SERVICE OF PROCESS
18 All named Defendants have been served and no further service 19 is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been 20 shown.
II. ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
22 No joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is 23 permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown.
III. JURISDICTION/VENUE
25 Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 1441 and 26 1446. Venue is not disputed. 27 /// 28 IV. DISCOVERY All discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed by May 18, 2022. In this context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any…