Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 THOMAS EDWARD PERRY, No. 2:21-cv-1719 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RICK HILL, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court is the complaint for screening (ECF No. 1) and plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied. The court will also dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) However, plaintiff’s application has not been filled out as plaintiff has only written “Not Applicable” at the top of the form. (Id. at 1.) As such, plaintiff has not filed a properly completed and signed in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee of $350.00 plus the $52.00 administrative fee.1

If…