Lozano
(PC) Chinsami v. Lozano
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHU CHINSAMI, No. 2:21-cv-1056 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
JARED LOZANO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that a device was implanted in his eye without his consent. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 3) and his complaint (ECF No. 7) for screening. For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny the recommend the motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a letter (ECF No. 1) and a motion to proceed (ECF No. 3) in forma pauperis in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The court construed plaintiff’s filing as an intent to file an action…