Rohrdanz

(PC) Bahena v. Rohrdanz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20211:20-cv-00618California819 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESMELING L. BAHENA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00618-NONE-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION REGARDING SETTLEMENT

FUNDS, LITIGATION EXPENSES, AND

D. ROHRDANZ, RESTITUTION

Defendant. (Docs. 41, 43)

16 On May 6, 2021, this matter settled at a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Doc. 33.) Per the terms provided on the record, Plaintiff would file a motion regarding settlement proceeds, litigation expenses, and restitution. On June 22, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Doc. 38.) Pursuant to the stipulation, the Court closed this case on June 23, 2021, but retained jurisdiction over the parties’ settlement agreement to enforce its terms, including to consider any motion related thereto. (Doc. 39.) Before the Court is Plaintiff’s anticipated motion regarding settlement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.