Sherman

(HC) Dedeker v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20212:20-cv-02056California519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JEREMY WILLIAM DEDEKER, No. 2:20-cv-2056-KJM-EFB P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STUART SHERMAN, Respondent. 15 Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 31, 2021, the court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend. ECF No. 24. Petitioner was granted thirty days in which to file an amended petition that states his claims with the clarity contained in his opposition to the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 20). The time for acting has passed and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded to the court’s order. A party’s failure to comply with any order or with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” E.D. Cal. L.R. 110. The court may dismiss an action with or without prejudice,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.