Ciolli

(PC) Barrett v. Ciolli

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20211:20-cv-01802California539 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY BARRETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01802-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT

COUNSEL

A. CIOLLI, et al., (ECF No. 27) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Anthony Curtis Barrett (“Plaintiff”) is a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel. (ECF No. 27.) For the following reasons, the Court will deny the motion. According to the motion, Plaintiff requests that the Court appoint counsel to represent him in this case because Plaintiff is unable to afford counsel. (ECF No. 24.) Additionally, Plaintiff’s imprisonment will greatly limit his ability to litigate. (Id.) The issues involved in this case are complex and will require significant research and investigation. (Id.) Plaintiff has limited access to the law library and limited…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.