Henry

(PC) Rodriguez v. Henry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20212:20-cv-01659California281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JULIAN RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:20-CV-1659-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMENDATIONS D. HENRY, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff erroneously listed Rodriguez and Poppachan as defendants in this matter. Plaintiff merely wanted the Court to note that Rodriguez and Poppachan are witnesses to Plaintiff’s claims. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that Rodriguez and 2 Poppachan be dismissed as defendants to this action, with prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(). Within 14 days after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.