Margrini
(PC) Gray-Garrigus v. Margrini
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BILLY JOE GRAY-GARRIGUS, Case No. 2:21-cv-00706-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER:
v. (1) DIRECTING SERVICE OF THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST
SHASTA COUNTY JAIL, et al., DEFENDANTS ERIK MARGRINI,
RANDALL, AND MARLAR
Defendants. (2) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS
ACTION
16 ECF No. 9
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT DEFENDANT SHASTA COUNTY
JAIL BE DISMISSED
20 Plaintiff Billy Joe Gray-Garrigus alleges that defendants Erik Margrini, Randall, and Marlar violated his Eighth Amendment rights by forcing him to share a jail cell with an inmate who they knew, or should have known, was COVID-positive. ECF No. 9 at 3-4. As a result, plaintiff contracted the disease. Id. at 3. These allegations state, for screening purposes, a cognizable deliberate indifference claim. I recommend dismissing defendant Shasta County Jail, however, insofar as it is not named in the amended…