(PS) Storman v. Alta Regional Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20212:20-cv-00907California4,331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL DAVID STORMAN, No. 2:20-cv-0907-KJM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER ALTA REGIONAL CENTER, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(3). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order dated September 21, 2021, the court directed plaintiff to file, within 30 days, a second amended complaint or a notice of election to stand by the allegations in his most recent complaint. On September 27, 2021, plaintiff filed a notice of election to stand on his first amended complaint. (ECF No. 24.) The undersigned therefore reviews the allegations in the first amended complaint. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff’s motion for recusal is also before the court. (ECF No. 25.) I. Motion for Recusal Federal law provides a “justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.