Lockyer

(PC) Hutchins, Jr. v. Lockyer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20211:15-cv-01537California7,808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLIFTON HUTCHINS, JR., Case No. 1:15-cv-01537-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT2 A. JOHAL1, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Defendant. (Doc. No. 59)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

CORRECT DOCKET

17 Pending before the Court is Defendant Johal’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed on December 23, 2019. (Doc. No. 59, “MSJ”). Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendant filed a reply. (Doc. Nos. 67, 68). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned finds no genuine dispute as to any material facts and recommends Defendant Johal’s MSJ be granted. /// /// 24 1 The docket currently reflects the names of other defendants who have been dismissed from this action. As discussed infra, this action is proceeding only against Defendant A. Johal. (See Doc. No. 55). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.