(PC)Hamilton

(PC)Hamilton v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20211:21-cv-01316California2,175 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GEORGE HAMILTON, Case No. 1:21-cv-01316-AWI-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (ECF Nos. 14, 19) KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al.,

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY

Defendants. FILING FEE IN FULL WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION (ECF No. 24) 18 George Hamilton (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this action. This action was transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on August 30, 2021, and the matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 3, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending that “Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED” and that “Plaintiff be directed to pay the $402.00 filing fee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.