Doris Anderson v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20211:21-cv-01134California358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DORIS ANDERSON, et al., Case No. 1: 21-cv-01134-DAD-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

COURT TO TERMINATE DAVID

v. POMAVILLE AS A DEFENDANT IN THIS

ACTION

COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., (ECF No. 14) Defendants.

16 On October 4, 2021, the Court entered the parties’ stipulation whereby the parties agreed in part to dismiss Defendant David Pomaville, and that the statute of limitations for the claims against such Defendant to be tolled until the close of fact discovery. (ECF No. 13.) On October 11, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a notice of dismissal of Defendant David Pomaville pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), without prejudice. (ECF No. 14.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.