Doris Anderson v. County of Fresno
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DORIS ANDERSON, et al., Case No. 1: 21-cv-01134-DAD-SAB
Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO TERMINATE DAVID
v. POMAVILLE AS A DEFENDANT IN THIS
ACTION
COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., (ECF No. 14) Defendants.
16 On October 4, 2021, the Court entered the parties’ stipulation whereby the parties agreed in part to dismiss Defendant David Pomaville, and that the statute of limitations for the claims against such Defendant to be tolled until the close of fact discovery. (ECF No. 13.) On October 11, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a notice of dismissal of Defendant David Pomaville pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), without prejudice. (ECF No. 14.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss…