(PS) Engel v. Client Security Fund Commission of the State Bar of CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20212:21-cv-00624California2,808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIUS M. ENGEL, No. 2:21-cv-0624 DB PS Plaintiff, v. CLIENT SECURITY FUND ORDER

COMMISSION OF THE CALIFORNIA

STATE BAR, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Julius Engel is proceeding in this action pro se. On July 14, 2021, this action was reassigned to the undersigned pursuant to the parties’ consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (ECF No. 10.) Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss submitted on August 2, 2021. (ECF No. 14.) For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted and plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on April 7, 2021, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) The complaint alleges that plaintiff “is a former member of the California state Bar,” who “is currently disbarred, which he believes //// ////…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.