(SS) Lail v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20211:20-cv-01349California6,079 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM LAIL, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-1349 JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL ) (DOC. 15) AND REMANDING THE ACTION v. ) PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. ) § 405(g) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN ) FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF WILLIAM LAIL AND Defendant. ) AGAINST DEFENDANT, KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY

William Lail asserts he is entitled to supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff argues the administrative law judge erred in evaluating the record and seeks judicial review of the decision denying his application for benefits. (See generally Doc. 15.) For the reasons set forth below, the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.