Redick

Redick v. Sonora Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20211:21-cv-00287California8,678 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANLEY E. REDICK, III, Case No. 1:21-cv-00287-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING

v. COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM AND DISMISSING ACTION FOR

SONORA POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 11, 13)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

18 I. INTRODUCTION Stanley E. Redick, III (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Following screening orders issued on March 17, 2021 and May 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint on May 26, 2021. (ECF No. 11.) On August 10, 2021, the Court issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff had failed to state any cognizable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.