Kelso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY, ) Case No.: 1:12-cv-000983-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. ) FOR RECONSIDERATION STRONACH, et al., ) (Doc. No. 299) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Plaintiff Joseph Raymond McCoy is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 28, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge denied Plaintiff’s sixth motion for an extension of time to file objections to the then-pending Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. No. 296.) Plaintiff now objects to the Court’s September 8, 2021 order. The Court construes Plaintiff’s objections as a motion for reconsideration. Rule 60(b) allows the Court to relieve a party from an order for “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in…