(PC) Howell v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20212:19-cv-00611California431 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM J. HOWELL, No 2:19-cv-00611-TLN-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Kareem J. Howell (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 5, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 34.) Plaintiff has filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 35), and Defendants J. Johnson, D. Anderson, S. Snowden, and J. Gamboa (collectively, “Defendants”) have filed a response (ECF No. 37). The Court agrees with Defendants that Plaintiff fails in his objections to 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.