(PC) Ashanti v. California Health Care Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20212:21-cv-00516California949 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ASKIA SANKOFA ASHANTI, formerly No. 2:21-CV-0516-DMC-P known as Lorenzo Renell Cunningham, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v.

CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE

FACILITY, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 9, 2021, the Court issued an order addressing Plaintiff’s (referred to as “Petitioner” because the operative pleading at the time was a Petition for Wirt of Mandamus) initial pleading and related filings. See ECF No. 10. The Court stated:

. . .Petitioner initiated this action with a pleading captioned “Petition for Writ of Mandamus (28 U.S.C. § 1651).” See ECF No. 1. Since filing his original pleading, Petitioner has separately filed two separate pleadings captioned “Supplemental Petition” and both citing 28 U.S.C. § 1651, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF Nos. 6 and 7. Under Eastern District of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.