(PS) Robinson v. Butte County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20212:21-cv-01845California336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH ROBINSON, No. 2:21-CV-1845-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER BUTTE COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 3, for the appointment of counsel, which Plaintiff has set for hearing before the undersigned in Redding, California, on November 10, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent plaintiffs in civil actions. See e.g. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). / / / / / / / / / Plaintiff contends…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.