Pola

Pola v. Rao

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20212:19-cv-01154California1,291 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAI POLA, No. 2:19-cv-01154-MCE-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER MAHENDER RAO and SRINIVAS

RAO,

15 Defendants. 16 Through this action, Plaintiff Sai Pola (“Plaintiff”) seeks damages from Defendants Mahender Rao and Srinivas Rao (collectively, “Defendants”) for wrongful expulsion from partnership, breach of fiduciary duty, and partnership accounting. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal and Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Motion”). ECF No. 25. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion is DENIED.1 Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 21, 2019, and the Court subsequently issued the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order (“PTSO”) on June 24, 2019. ECF Nos. 1, 4. According to the PTSO, all non-expert discovery was to be completed no later than 365 days from the date the case was opened, and all dispositive motions were to be filed no 27 1 Because oral argument would not be of material…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.