Pearson

(HC) Wallace v. Pearson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20212:21-cv-00927California377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MILO WALLACE, No. 2:21-cv-00927 TLN DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNKNOWN, Respondent. 15 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus. On June 1, 2021, the court dismissed petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus with leave to file an amended petition within thirty days. (ECF No. 3.) On August 26, 2021, the court ordered the petitioner to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file an amended petition. (ECF No. 9.) Petitioner was warned that failure to comply with court orders would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 3.) More than thirty days have passed and petitioner has not filed an amended petition, responded to the order to show cause, requested an extension of time, or otherwise responded to the court’s orders. Accordingly, it will be recommended that this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.