(PC) Rodriguez v. Ralph Diaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHNATHAN C. RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:20-cv-1650 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed July 19, 2021 the undersigned adopted the April 13, 2020 Screening Order (ECF No. 10), which was issued by a magistrate judge in the Central District of California, and found that the complaint did not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 17. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 2. After plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, he was given an additional twenty-one days to amend the complaint and warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning. ECF No. 18. Twenty-one days have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s…