(SS) Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20211:20-cv-00462California4,145 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Introduction

12 Plaintiff Randy Scott Jones (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 13 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his applications for 14 disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income pursuant to Titles II and XVI, 15 respectively, of the Social Security Act. The matter is before the Court on the parties’ briefs 16 which were submitted without oral argument to the Honorable Gary S. Austin, United States 17 Magistrate Judge. See Docs. 23, 27, 28. After reviewing the record the Court finds that 18 substantial evidence and applicable law support the ALJ’s decision. Plaintiff’s appeal is therefore 19 denied.

II. Factual and Procedural Background2

21 On December 19, 2016 Plaintiff applied for benefits alleging disability as of July 4, 2015 22 due to PTSD, sciatica, history of heart attack, degenerative disc disease, COPD, and hearing loss. 23 AR 77. The Commissioner denied the applications initially on April 27, 2017 and on 24 reconsideration on July 14, 2017. AR 92, 155. 25 Plaintiff requested a hearing which was held before an Administrative Law Judge (the

1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.