(PC) Howard v. Brown, Jr.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20211:18-cv-01710California1,087 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 MICHAEL ANTHONY HOWARD, Case No. 1:18-cv-01710-DAD-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT: 1) THIS CASE v. BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE SGT. ENCINAS, et al., TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER AND TO PROSECUTE THIS CASE; AND Defendants. 2) ALL OUTSTANDING MOTION(S) BE DENIED AS MOOT

(ECF No. 65)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

16 Michael Howard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which includes state law claims. On July 12, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment “on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to properly exhaust administrative remedies related to the federal claims asserted in this action as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e; and Plaintiff failed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.