Frederick

(PC) Jacques v. Frederick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20212:21-cv-00541California1,055 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL E. JACQUES, Case No. 2:21-cv-00541-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT:

v. (1) PLAINTIFF NOTIFY THE COURT

OF HIS INTENTION TO STAND BY HIS

J. FREDERICK, et al., COMPLAINT SUBJECT TO A

RECOMMENDATION THAT IT BE

Defendants. DISMISSED

OR

(2) FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

ECF No. 14

SIXTY-DAY DEADLINE

18 19 This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint. ECF No. 14. In it, plaintiff alleges that the defendants violated his due process rights by assigning him an “R” suffix and administratively identifying him as a sex offender. Plaintiff has, for the reasons stated below, failed to state a viable claim. I will give him a final opportunity to amend before recommending that this action be dismissed. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.