(PC) Bellinger v. Nadaine Are Better

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN BELLINGER, No. 2:21-cv-1525 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND NADAINE ARE BETTER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 On August 31, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings…