Lawrence

(PC) Hudson v. Lawrence

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20212:20-cv-00412California2,565 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON HUDSON, No. 2:20-cv-0412 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RONALD A. LAWRENCE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is before the court. (ECF No. 26.) For the reasons set forth, the undersigned will recommend the motion be denied without prejudice to the filing of a new motion on or before the deadline for filing dispositive motions. In any new motion for summary judgment, plaintiff shall comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Local Rule 260 as set forth herein. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On April 6, 2021, the court screened plaintiff's second amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and found it stated a claim under the Fourteenth Amendment against Officer Spencer for falsifying a police report, a Fourth Amendment excessive force claim against Officer Spencer, and a Fourth Amendment failure to protect claim against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.