(PC) McCoy v. Sacramento Jail Mental Health Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEROME ELI MCCOY, No. 2:19-cv-1092 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
SACRAMENTO JAIL MENTAL
HEALTH SERVICES,
15 Defendant.
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 18 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 30, 2021, plaintiff’s second amended complaint was screened and found to 21 contain both cognizable and non-cognizable claims. See generally ECF No. 16. As a result, 22 plaintiff was directed to return a notice to the court within fourteen days stating how he wished to 23 proceed. See id. at 6-7. 24 On August 11, 2021, the court’s order was returned as undeliverable. Since then, plaintiff 25 has not filed a change of address with the court. Local Rule 183(b) requires that a party 26 appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address…