Newsom

(PC) Williams v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20212:20-cv-00100California341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-0100 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 6, 2021, the complaint was screened and plaintiff was given thirty days leave to file a first amended complaint. ECF No. 7. On July 13, 2021, plaintiff was granted an additional sixty days within which to file his amended complaint. ECF No. 11. Sixty days from that date have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a District Court Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.