Haile

(PC) Sahm v. Haile

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20212:21-cv-01436California1,896 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 STANLEY CARL SAHM, No. 2:21-cv-1436-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER B. HAILE, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel. He commenced this civil action in the Solano County Superior Court and defendant Haile removed it to federal court on August 11, 2021. Defendant requests that the court screen the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, or which fail to state a cognizable claim. ECF No. 2. After reviewing the complaint pursuant to § 1915A, the court concludes that it fails to state a cognizable claim and must be dismissed with leave to amend. Jurisdiction Except where Congress otherwise dictates, a defendant may remove to federal court “any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction . . . .” 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). Federal courts have original jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.