Jones

(HC) Browand v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20212:21-cv-00184California477 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ARTHUR BROWAND, No. 2:21-cv-0184-JAM-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, Respondent. 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 26, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Petitioner has, however, filed a motion to stay these proceedings and “remand” the case to the California Supreme Court to allow him to exhaust his unexhausted claims. ECF No. 18. The court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.